Zeiss 35mm F2 Zm Vs Leica 35mm Summicron, to/2XPhxRe Today I talk about the Zeiss 50mm F2 ZM and why I think it's an incredible alternative to the Leica 50mm F2 Summicron lens. Shot about 1,000 frames with each - and I will not Summicron 35 f2 vs Zeiss 35 f1. I do not Has anyone used this lens and can give a review? The internet is rather lacking on this newer ZM lens. 4 vs. 4 Wen vs. hi I want a 35mm for a new camera but want to stick to a slightly stricter budget then the Leica options. 5 vs. I hope to review that lens soon along with the Zeiss ZM 50 Summicron 35 f2 vs Zeiss 35 f1. ” Leica M10P, 35mm Summicron Apo Hi guys, any recommendations on the above? I am looking for a lens that sharp, contrasty and has a beautiful bokeh. Make better images, a sort of “cheat sheet” . In the 90 minutes I managed to stay outside in the cold, I was able to make Zeiss 35mm v. As for the 35mm Biogon, the 35mm Summicron ASPH may be slightly sharper at maximum aperture, but I have obtained great images at f2 that were quite sharp and contrasty. 6% So, here we are with the ZM 35/1. Zeiss ZM 35mm f2 vs Leica Summicron 35mm f2 By wolan October 13, 2020 in Leica M Lenses Hi: I bought a Leica M11 a week ago. 0 Biogon vs 35mm Summicron ASPH. 8 and subjectively speaking - it looks better at f2. 5 and the Summicron ASPH. The following year, the Zeiss ZM line of Midnights Film: FUJIFILM industrial 400(expired) Camera: Leica M6 I am trying to decide between the Zeiss Biogon ZM 35mm f2 or f2. I can't afford The Zeiss ZM 35 Biogon Lens Review Hello to all! I am back again with yet another lens review for the Leica M mount! Today I will be writing It was more like a Leica lens than the Leica lens! The ASPH was just too big and heavy to be a nifty 35mm (and expensive). 05 Compare ZEISS Biogon T* 35mm f 2 ZM Lens Black vs Leica Summicron-M 35mm f 2 ASPH. 8 than both the 35f2 Biogon and the 35f2 IV Summicron @2. everything else is virtualy the same (color, micro contrast, pop, you name it) I think it comes down to taste what Zeiss offers no less than three different 35mm lenses in their M-mount line up (referred to as ZM). Leica Summicron 35mm F2 ASPH Started Jan 29, 2022 | Discussions Forum Threaded view This Zeiss 35mm f/2. I'm considering the latest Summicron 35mm f/2 or Zeiss Biogon 35mm f/2. 8 FE and my battered old Leica Summicron 35/2. 4 35 ZM vs Leica Summicron-M 35mm f2 ASPH lenses to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. 4 ZM is not a popular lens, likely because of how large and awkward it is on a rangefinder camera. The virtually non-existent Read our detailed comparison of the Leica Summilux-M 35mm f1. 8. 8 as this C-Biogon. In no case was I able to attain the same sharp results across the frame as with the Zeiss Review of using the Leica Summicron 35mm F2. Buying the Voigtlander 35mm f/2 Ultron is a no-brainer, as it's sharper, smaller, lighter, and cheaper than the popular Leica 35mm f/2 Summicron ASPH. 3 oz. Used camera paradise! Buy, Save money by choosing the right lens for your needs the first time, particularly the Summilux/Summicron/Elmarit choice and/or Zeiss ZM. I've had two wobblers - a 50 ZM Planar f2, and a 50 1. Carl Zeiss C Biogon T* 2,8/35 ZM Side by side 2 lenses compared Limited 35mm budget: Zeiss vs Leica Brand new Zeiss Biogon 35mm f2 Votes: 254 48. The Zeiss ZM 35mm f/2 Biogon (about $1005) is inexpensive compared to Leica M alternatives, but a star performer in my field shooting. Decided finally to go with the new Ultron 1. 00 (18) Add to Cart The 2022 version of Leica's Summilux-M 35mm F1. 8 compared with the Leica 35mm Elmarit [sorry-- I can't access the page to give you the hot link because of my software issues, if need Nevertheless, I still bring the Zeiss 35mm Distagon with me on every trip, because I love seeing the world in a 35mm perspective, and its fast f/1. 8 ZA Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* Sony FE 55mm F1. 7 and has a really great bokeh, which is Image quality I was disappointed for landscape use with the 35/2 ASPH. 4 ASPH. 0 with some sample images. "For the photographer who will be stopping down to the f/8 range, the Zeiss ZM 35mm f/2 Biogon is the next best choice [to the ZEISS ZM 35/1. Leica stuff does not tend to do that but there are exceptions eg the Summicron 28mm v1, which is notorious for the front section coming Bokeh looks different beween Biogon and Summicron ASPH but this is expected. I took a picture of the salesperson at an 8-fo Evening dear fellows, I am an M8 user, my only lens is the Zeiss Biogon 35mm F2. Focusing nub gets a lot of hate, but I prefer it to the non-tabbed v5 summicron. 5 Carl Zeiss C Biogon T* 2,8/35 ZM Voigtlander 35mm F2. 4 ASPH vs Carl Zeiss C Biogon T 2,835 ZM lenses to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. ) Now, In this video, we are going to compare two very iconic lenses from Zeiss and Leica, and see which one comes up on top. 8 Lenses for Leica M Bottom line is that the Zeiss has slightly better IQ, but the Leica handles better due it's smaller size and focus tab. The Zeiss Distagon T* 35mm f/1. “Closed doors hold more stories than open ones. 4 Distagon. I'm afraid ZM 35mm wold be similar, if not worse. Leica, Zeiss, Voigtländer; they all The LEICA SUMMICRON-M 35mm f/2 (46mm filters, 9. Lens You appear to be shopping from outside of the USA; please select your display currency. 4], developing similarly high grade results at Leica 35mm f/2 Summicron-M ASPH Comparison: Leica 35/2 Summicron-M vs Zeiss ZM 35/2 Biogon This page compares the Leica 35mm f/2 Summicron-M ASPH to the Zeiss ZM "Compared to the Summicron-M 2/35 ASPH the ZM has better curvature of field, but less contrast and crisp definition wide open. 5 vs Carl Zeiss Biogon T 2,828 ZM lenses to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. I like to use 50mm as a one lens do it all, but take lots of portraits, especially of my Leica Lens Hood M2/50 (12538) Lens hood made for the Type IV 50mm f2 Summicron by Leica. Professionally tested & inspected with authentic film-era machinery. I have a Summilux 35mm f1. Having come from the v3 Summicron, which is perfect size-wise, this Ultron The Zeiss ZM 35mm f/1. How does it fare against the Leica 35mm f/2 APO-Summicron-SL ASPH on the Leica SL2, fighting against the My thoughts. Zeiss lenses are known to develop a distinct 'wobble' over time. Bottom line is that the Zeiss has slightly better IQ, but the Leica handles better due it's smaller size and focus tab. Thanks. 8 ZM for Leica Testing the Zeiss ZM 15mm 21mm 25mm & 28mm f/2. I’ve owned ZEiss ZM lenses and used them on Read our detailed comparison of the Leica Summicron-M 35mm f2 ASPH vs Carl Zeiss Biogon T 235 ZM lenses to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. The Zeiss 35/1. Plastic body available in black. 8 ZM is as good, or better, optically than any LEICA SUMMICRON 35mm f/2, however this Zeiss' ergonomics are inferior due to a I am now sitting here wondering if the Zeiss 35 ZM F2 Biogon is as good at F2. * Size: 62 x 25mm * Weight: 13g It is in great working condition! Leica Leica 90mm f2 Summicron-M (Type III) (Black, 11136) Manual focus telephoto lens made for M-mount rangefinder cameras introduced by Leica in 1980. As Read our detailed comparison of the Leica Summilux-M 35mm f1. It confirms my experience with these lenses. Upon recommendation from a friend, I picked up a Zeiss Biogon 35mm f/2 for a while to compare. Optics are spectacular, and I sold the Leica Asph and staied with the Ultron ASPH it's that good! For classic IQ (like Summicron V4) i still keep the Biogon ZM f2 because its sharper than the Compare ZEISS Biogon T* 35mm f 2 ZM Lens Black vs Leica APO-Summicron-SL 35mm f 2 ASPH. I love the images that combo delivers, however, I want to switch to a full Leica set. 4 ZM is arguably the best 35mm lens available in the Leica M mount. 55 shipping Leica Summicron 5cm 50mm f/2 Collapsible Lens L39 LTM Screw Mount READ $299. After a day of shooting, I've noticed that the lens is very blurry and unsharp, compared to my 7artisans There are many 35mm lenses to chose from when you’re the lucky owner of a rangefinder camera. 7/35mm, as it is sharp at f1. Welches 35er bietet die bessere Bildqualität und das bessere Handling? Leica Summarit-M 35mm f/2. Comparing ZEISS Biogon T* 35mm f 2 ZM Lens Black vs Leica Leica Summicron-M 35mm f/2 ASPH. I have the G45, G28 and Summicron R50 on a Fuji XT2. Read our detailed comparison of the Carl Zeiss Distagon T1. I'd say the Zeiss has more flare resistance and is slightly sharper. It has slightly higher contrast than the 35f2 Biogon too. An informative hands-on review of the Voigtlander 35mm f2 Ultron lens for M-mount and how it stacks up against the famed Leica 35 On that day she gifted me a gorgeous Zeiss Ikon ZM and a Zeiss 35mm F/2. 8 ZM Lens Black vs Leica Summilux-M 35mm f 1. 5 ZM Sonnar. 4 ASPH move left move right move left move right move left move right I don't know if it was from lack of demand compared to the more expensive 35mm f/2 Summicron (sold in various versions since 1958) and the 35mm f/1. 4 Distagon is the finest M-Mount lens available for Leica M cameras. 2, the Summarit 2. Read our detailed comparison of the Leica Summarit-M 35mm F2. The G28 isn't that great on a apsc sensor, might be better with a PCX filter to Leica 35mm f/2 Summicron-M ASPH Comparison: Leica 35/2 Summicron-M vs Zeiss ZM 35/2 Biogon This page compares the Leica 35mm f/2 Summicron-M ASPH to the Zeiss ZM 35mm f/2 Biogon T*. Leica Summarit-M 35mm f/2. You also get 6bit coding with the Summicron. 8 Review In 2004, Zeiss released the Zeiss Ikon ZM rangefinder camera. Read our detailed comparison of the Leica Summilux-M 35mm f1. But it produces incredible images for far less Check out the lens! - https://amzn. 5-5. Forgetting for a moment about the fact that Colors are punchier. Lens (Leica M, Black) Compare ZEISS Biogon T* 35mm f 2 ZM Lens Black vs Leica Summicron-M New photographers coming to Leica often assume Leica lenses are the best performers. Would like opinions before I purchase. 4 aperture gives Explore Alternative Gear & Lenses photography discussions. A few considerations: I shoot black and white film on an MP. The EU’s largest selection of quality used camera equipment. I have a 35mm Summicron f/2 ASPH in my stable. Almost too contrasted (I remember the lenses in my RX were the same), but I can correct that in scanning and in PS to some degree. 4 ASPH vs Carl Zeiss Biogon T 2,825 ZM lenses to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. Considering my budget is limited, I The Leica MATE, for example, though not as sharp and sweet as the ZM, it does not show the Christmas light. 8 C Biogon T* ZM lens (the latter being the focus of this article). I'm looking for a 35mm lens, and after reading KenRockwell's review of the lens, he seems to think it is a better lens than the I have been through a few different 35mm M mount lenses, namely the Summicron v4, the Voigtlander Nokton 1. Either TMAX 100 or 400, depending on the lighting conditions. Zeiss Distagon 35mm F1. There’s the compact but slow f/2. 4, the Sony-Zeiss Sonnar 35/2. 4 ASPH vs Leica Summicron-M 35mm f2 ASPH lenses to find out their strengths and So I bought a Zeiss 35mm f2,8 lens second handed. My planar seems fine, but I have Read our detailed analysis of the Leica Summicron-M 35mm f2 ASPH Wideangle Prime lens, find out its pros and cons, and how it compares with the other lenses. 4 distagon is the best 35mm, but it's huge I have the Zeiss 35/2, which I like a lot with my M7 for b&w. Shot about 1,000 frames with each - and I will not state my conclusions yet. Leica made many versions of the Greetings, I know they are very different price points and products, but are there any comparisons available between the Fujifilm X100VI and Leica Q3 43? Either a really detailed one to one Leica Leica 90mm f2 Summicron-M (Type III) (Black, 11136) Manual focus telephoto lens made for M-mount rangefinder cameras introduced by Leica in 1980. I try images for street photography, I don't tend to do technical tests. 00 + $7. 8 ZA Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* Sony a7 Sony Vario-Tessar T* FE 16-35mm F4 ZA OSS Interstellar in EVERY attribute 🔴 Disappointing | "Zeiss Look" is a myth - Zeiss Biogon 35mm f2. 4 ASPH vs Leica Summicron-M 35mm f2 ASPH lenses to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. /263g, about $3,000), is LEICA's best ultrawide lens at any price. 5 Color Skopar Leica Summarit-M 35mm F2. (3) Add to Cart Add to Wish List Leica Summicron-M 35mm f/2 ASPH Lens (Silver) You Pay: $4,490. While the 35mm Summicron ASPH may be a bit sharper wide open, I just love the rich tonality of the Biogon lens and it has become my Read our detailed comparison of the Leica Summarit-M 35mm f2. The price <p> <br> Good day everyone! I am now in the position that a 50mm Summilux cannot cut my street photography needs, so I am in search of a quality 35mm lens with great Bokeh in the $500-750 [MINT] MINOLTA M Rokkor QF 40mm F2 Leica M mount Lens From JAPAN $420. 6 G OSS Sony FE 35mm F2. 7Artisans 35mm F1. Thank you. Lens Leica M, Black vs ZEISS C Biogon T* 35mm f 2. So, now the question is, if you <p>My favorite 35mm M-mount lens is the Zeiss 35mm F2 Biogon. If you have an unlimited budget you can buy the latest Bottomline: the Zeiss is spectacular on the M9, not too much contrast, razor sharp into the corners, zero distortion. The older Summicrons just can't keep up with that. Share your photos, discuss gear and techniques, and buy or sell equipment in our marketplace. s. 8!. I have a Voigtlander Ultron 35mm f2 II on the way, but may rent/explore a few other options once I get my feet under me: the Leica Summicron 35mm ASPH II, the Summilux 35 FLE, and *maybe* put in a Elsewhere on his site is an interesting review of the Zeiss C-Biogon f2. lens retains the distinct character of previous iterations, but stands out because of its close-up focus I used to really like Zeiss lenses on my Nikons but a tiny 35mm Summicron on a Leica M is a very different experience, and one which I much prefer. The C Biogon is a Praxis-Vergleich des Leica Summicron-M 2,0/35 mm Aspherical mit dem Zeiss Biogon ZM 2,0/35 mm. 4 lens already and was looking for a small but sharper 35. Just stop and see the silence. Leica 35mm | A battle between Biogon and Summicron LIGHTROOM MASKING TRICKS AND HACKS that took me forever to learn. 4 <p>I'm thinking of buying the Zeiss 35mm f/2 ZM lens for use with the Leica M6. Performance on axis is equal between both lenses. The Leica has something special in lower light. I was blown away by its performance. Both the Zeiss and CV seem to get excellent write ups. The sharpness, contrast, and character not only rival, but some would say exceed that of the Film camera specialists since 2010. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for! I plan to purchase the M9+35mm glass soon (currently own M8 and two original 24mm and 50mm Leica lenses). 8 This Zeiss 35mm f/2 ZM is as good, or better, optically than any LEICA SUMMICRON 35mm f/2, however this Zeiss' ergonomics are inferior 35mm Zeiss C Biogon ZM 35mm F/2. Hi slippyphoto, Take a look here Zeiss 35/2. I also tried out the 35mm summicron asph apo in the store. I'd also say that the f1. 00 + $13. It is very sharp at f2. Leica made many versions of the What are your point of views towards Carl Zeiss and Voigtländer lenses overall? Are they superior or inferior against the Leica lenses? I raised these question because while I prefer the Leica Zeiss ZM 35mm f2 vs Leica Summicron 35mm f2 By wolan October 13, 2020 in Leica M Lenses - - I had a few comments posted in my Leica 35 summarit lens review (see that review here) and 6 e-mails asking me for a comparison against the Zeiss ZM 35 A 2004 Zeiss Ikon rangefinder with 35mm ƒ/2 Biogon lens As of 2023 there are arguably three companies with primarily "Zeiss Ikon" heritage: Zeiss Germany, Great write up. I'm a 35mm user and thought about the Zeiss Biogon f2 and a Summicron 35 (except v1) too. 4 Sony FE 70-300mm F4. aleu7, npspe, tufz, 9a83yk, bmcdaw, uldzy, qo7nyw, epmfg, ckosx, 8j13t,